This is the finding suggested by preliminary research published online in the journal Sexually Transmitted Infections.
If the findings reflect a national trend, this could have implications for the true prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection in the population, which is based on the numbers of “undiagnosed” patients at sexual health clinics, say the authors.
Currently, it is estimated that around one in four people in the UK who is HIV positive doesn’t know they’re infected with the virus.
The estimate is based on several sources of data, including the GUMAnon Survey, which routinely looks for HIV infection in blood samples taken from patients to test for syphilis at one of 16 participating sexual health clinics across the UK.
The results are then matched with the individual’s diagnostic status—whether they had been diagnosed before their arrival at the clinic, or were diagnosed at their clinic visit, or left the clinic “unaware” of their HIV status.
It is thought that a proportion of patients who do know their HIV status nevertheless choose not to reveal it to NHS staff when attending for services elsewhere.
To test this theory, the researchers analysed all HIV positive samples from one participating GUMAnon clinic in London in 2009 for the presence of very low viral loads— a hallmark of successful drug treatment—and various antiretroviral drugs.
Of the 130 samples which matched clinic records, 28 were from patients who were not known to be HIV positive before their arrival at clinic. Ten had been tested for HIV at their clinic visit.
The remaining 18 did not have a test at the clinic, and were therefore classified as undiagnosed. Yet almost three out of four (72%) of these samples had very low viral loads, indicative of successful drug treatment.
Only eight samples were of sufficient volume to be able to officially test for antiretroviral drugs, but evidence of HIV treatment was found in all of them.
“This is the first published objective evidence that non-disclosure of HIV status as a phenomenon exists in patients attending [sexual health] clinics in the UK,” write the authors.
“Given the high proportion of individuals classified within this study as [non-disclosing], the extent to which these findings can be extrapolated to other clinics, and the degree to which they may influence estimates of the proportion of undiagnosed HIV in the community, warrants further study,” they conclude.
The reasons why they don’t come clean(sic) about their HIV status may be that they don’t want to be “judged,” given that they have come to the clinic with another infection, which implies they are indulging in risky sexual behaviour, suggests lead author Dr Ann Sullivan of London’s Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
But by not revealing their HIV status, they could be missing out on the chance to be treated more holistically and discuss other aspects of their health which might be affected by HIV, she says.
Original Article via Onmedica, taking medical information further.
The comment by Ann (above) implies NHS staff are predisposed with attitudes toward sex. Especially when using phrases like “when they don’t come clean” – However, NHS staff; particularly those within genitourinary medicine should not assume those who wish to have a HIV test participate in “risky sexual behaviour” as for a lot of people, HIV infection can simply occur when the HIV status of a sexual partner is positive, but not known and undiagnosed, then innocently passed to another (which is why is it recommended that condoms are used if the HIV status of the other person is unknown.
Do you have an opinion on this? – Let us know in the comments below.
- Doctors are ‘missing HIV signs’
- Sexual Healthcare ‘at risk from NHS changes’
- NHS Has ‘Outdated Attitude’ Towards HIV Patients
- Condoms: Why are we still embarrassed about using them?