Tag Archives: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

Commonwealth Publication Raises Concerns Over Rights of HIV and AIDS Carers

From left to right: Dr Marilyn Waring, Dr Anit Mukherjee and Dr Meena Shivdas at the launch of 'Who Cares: the Economics of Dignity'.

“They were not looked on by the nurses, the doctors. They didn’t want to touch them, they were scorned” – L, unpaid carer, Jamaica

A breakthrough research publication, calling on governments to make changes to their policies to recognise the rights of unpaid carers and their crucial role in dealing with HIV and AIDS, was launched at the Commonwealth Secretariat on 3 October 2011.

Who Cares? The Economics of Dignity’ captures the experiences of unpaid carers from across the Commonwealth, who have battled stigma and poverty with little support from authorities, to look after family members, friends and lovers affected by HIV and AIDS.

It was launched at a reception at the Secretariat’s headquarters at Marlborough House by Commonwealth Deputy Secretary-General Ransford Smith, along with a second book on ‘Development Challenges of HIV/AIDS in Small States’.

Who Cares? The Economics of Dignity’ was commissioned by the Secretariat and based on research by Dr Marilyn Waring, the late Dr Robert Carr, Dr Anit Mukherjee, and the Secretariat’s adviser on Gender Dr Meena Shivdas.

It covers the experiences of unpaid carers in the household in Bangladesh, Botswana, Canada, Guyana, India, Jamaica, Namibia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea and Uganda, and highlights the need to protect the rights of unpaid HIV and AIDS carers. It has been described as a breakthrough as previous research only focused on the illness.

“We have really challenged some of the fundamental understanding on human rights, particularly on dignity,” said Dr Waring.

“We asked our unpaid carers did you have any choice about what they were doing. Not one of them had a choice.”

Mr Smith paid tribute to the late Dr Carr, who passed away in May 2011, after writing the book’s final chapter.

The second publication ‘Development Challenges of HIV/AIDS in Small States’ by Karl Theodore, Mahendra Reddy and Happy Siphambe, analyses the economic impacts of HIV/AIDS in the Pacific, Southern Africa and Caribbean.

Mr Smith commended the book for highlighting good practices in dealing with HIV and AIDS and opportunities to modernise in the face of the epidemic.

The double book launch was in the wings of a Commonwealth Roundtable on 3-4 October 2011, to discuss the ‘Who Cares? The Economics of Dignity’ book’s research findings, and contribute to the development of a framework for the Secretariat’s work on social protection. Social protection consists of policies and programmes designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability.

According to UNAIDS 34 million people are living with HIV. Out of this, 12 million people urgently require access to treatment, care and support, and 9 million do not have access to treatment and will die of AIDS.

“They [people with HIV and AIDS] were not looked on by the nurses, the doctors. They didn’t want to touch them, they were scorned,” said L, an unpaid carer in Jamaica, whose experiences are documented in the book.

The book’s researchers found that carers, most often women and girls, believe they have no choice but to provide for their dying loved one, and with this lack of choice their rights and dignity are invisibly breached and replaced by ‘capability servitude’ – where the carer is bound by their task and charge.

“They were stigmatised and usual community and extended family care cultures broke down. They had no rest, their working conditions were not safe or healthy, their caring didn’t ‘count’ as work, but was a far better standard of care than the state provided,” said Dr Waring.

“This research then raises very important questions in the context of the current debate about social protection, where there is significant tension between what the multilaterals and international financial institutions are choosing to see as social protection – almost always as a payment of some kind – and a rights-based holistic approach to social protection that includes specific inputs of health and education, attention to the rights of the carer, and to the legal rights for widows and orphans – for example to inheritance and to land.”

Dr Mukherjee warns that the secondary impact is that development is hampered, as women and girls are denied access to basic needs such as food, water and healthcare, and the community is disadvantaged without their contribution to community life.

“In that sense, the whole notion of development as freedom and justice is denied to women and girls who are unpaid carers,” he said.

The book warns that the current debt crisis facing the major economies in the world will have serious consequences for funding global HIV programmes. The economic downturn is likely to hit national budgets hard, meaning lower public spending and a larger burden on unpaid carers.

As part of the research into the book an advocacy workshop with Commonwealth parliamentarians was held in Barbados in 2010 to discuss how parliamentarians can play a key, influencing role in changing policy on HIV care.

Original Article via thecommonwealth.org

Follow LASS on Twitter
or subscribe via email

Young People Key to Reversing the HIV/AIDS Epidemic

A report by The Global Inter-Agency Task Team (IATT) titled ‘Securing the Future’ on HIV and Young People  has stated that global commitments to HIV eradication will only be achieved if the needs of the young people are recognized and if their human rights are met and protected. The IATT report stresses that young people are a key resource in reversing the AIDS epidemic. They note that the legal and policy barriers that prevent young people from accessing HIV services must first be addressed in order for young people to become more effectively engaged in the response.

The youth-led response has been effective, as data from UNAIDS shows that young people are leading the “HIV prevention revolution”,  taking more action to protect themselves and changing their sexual behaviours in order to avoid contracting the disease. As a result, in 15 out of the 21 countries worst affected by HIV/AIDS, the HIV prevalence among young people is dropping.

This trend is overwhelmingly positive considering that in 2009 young people accounted for 41% of all new infections, with 3000 new infections every day. In 2009, in total, there were 4.9 million youths living with HIV/AIDS worldwide. These statistics illustrate the urgent need to tailor HIV prevention and treatment programmes in order to reduce infections worldwide.

A side event to the United Nations meeting on youth in New York, (under the theme of “Youth: Dialogue and mutual understanding”) allowed many young people to have direct conversations with policy-makers to encourage an increase in HIV prevention and treatment services for young people, as well as to encourage more active involvement and leadership of young people in the AIDS response. At this event several agencies collaborated (including UNFPA, ILO, Global Youth Coalition on HIV/AIDS, Population Council and Catholic Relief Services and UNAIDS) alongside the young leaders and governments, to look for solutions to reach their shared mission of “Zero new HIV infections, Zero discrimination and Zero AIDS-related deaths” among young people.

The report also acknowledges that simply directing more resources towards the youth population will not necessarily increase HIV testing and uptake of services. Instead, it argues that there is a need to empower young people, especially young women, to exercise their sexual and reproductive health rights. By doing so, the “HIV prevention revolution” can continue with vigour. The report also agues that there is a need to improve programmes for young people and to repeal national laws and policies that restrict access to HIV services. It is therefore, once again, not only an issue of lack of treatments or even lack of young people’s adherence to the treatments and preventing illness, but rather an issue of lack of political will to address the laws and policies that restrict access to services.

Follow LASS on Twitter
or subscribe via email